JUM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Russell, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Damato, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Russell, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Damato, N.

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol 12, Issue 3 145-151, Copyright © 1993 by American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Sonographic diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy with endovaginal probes: what really has changed?

S. A. Russell, R. A. Filly and N. Damato
Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco 94143-0628.

To evaluate the impact of endovaginal (EV) sonography in the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy, a 2 year retrospective study was performed identifying 123 at-risk patients. Of these 123 women, 19 (15.4%) had a surgically proved ectopic pregnancy, only three (15.8%) of which were visualized directly at sonography. A confident diagnosis of an intrauterine pregnancy (IUP) was made at the initial scan in 74%, which contrasts with 58% diagnosed at the first transabdominal (TA) scan in an earlier study from this laboratory, thus confirming an improvement in diagnostic ability with EV transducers. This study has failed to confirm some findings of other workers, particularly that adnexal ring-like structures are visualized frequently in the presence of an ectopic pregnancy. No adnexal rings were observed in our 19 cases. The combination of an adnexal mass and free pelvic fluid was found to correlate best with the presence of an ectopic pregnancy. This study further emphasizes that a significant proportion (26.3%) of ectopic pregnancies have a normal EV sonogram at presentation. The group failing to demonstrate an IUP and showing no evidence of an adnexal mass or pelvic fluid (i.e., a normal pelvic sonogram) carried a 1:3 risk for the presence of an ectopic pregnancy, a result that is very similar to our data published before the introduction of EV technology. We conclude that, although it provides a significant improvement and refinement in the recognition of intrauterine pregnancies, EV scanning does not permit a confident diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy in many cases.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. Levine
Ectopic Pregnancy
Radiology, November 1, 2007; 245(2): 385 - 397.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
M. Atri
Ectopic Pregnancy Versus Corpus Luteum Cyst Revisited: Best Doppler Predictors
J. Ultrasound Med., November 1, 2003; 22(11): 1181 - 1184.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Atri, C.-M. Chow, G. Kintzen, P. Gillett, A. A. Aldis, M. Thibodeau, C. Reinhold, and P. M. Bret
Expectant Treatment of Ectopic Pregnancies: Clinical and Sonographic Predictors
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2001; 176(1): 123 - 127.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1993 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.