JUM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lim, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Ko, Y. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lim, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Ko, Y. T.

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol 11, Issue 3 91-94, Copyright © 1992 by American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Sonographic detection of duodenal ulcer

J. H. Lim, D. H. Lee and Y. T. Ko
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

Using a wall thickness of greater than 5 mm for the first portion of the duodenum as the criterion for the sonographic diagnosis of duodenal ulcer, we studied the value of sonography in detecting this lesion. Endoscopy (88 patients) and upper gastrointestinal barium studies (12 patients) were used as the gold standards for the diagnosis. The study included 100 patients in whom gastrointestinal disease was suspected (20 with duodenal ulcer and 80 with normal findings). Of the 20 duodenal ulcers verified by endoscopy or upper gastrointestinal series, 13 patients had duodenal wall thickening, six had normal wall thickness, and one was nondiagnostic. Of the 80 subjects with normal findings on endoscopy or upper gastrointestinal series, 73 patients had a normal duodenum, four had wall thickening, and three were nondiagnostic. Considering the four nondiagnostic cases as sonographic errors, there were six false-negative cases and four false-positive cases (a sensitivity of 65%, specificity of 91%, positive predictive value of 76%, and negative predictive value of 92%). Our results show that sonography is not sufficiently sensitive to be used as a screening test, nor is it specific for duodenal ulcer, but a thickened duodenal wall of over 5 mm on sonography warrants additional work-up.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
S. Asai, H. Kijima, S. Yamamoto, S. Shiraishi, T. Suzuki, Y. Maeda, H. Matsushita, and H. Miyachi
Gastroduodenal Intussusception Secondary to Pedunculated Gastric Carcinoma
J. Ultrasound Med., April 1, 2008; 27(4): 673 - 676.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.