JUM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Borgstede, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Clagett, G. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Borgstede, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Clagett, G. E.

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol 11, Issue 3 85-89, Copyright © 1992 by American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Types, frequency, and significance of alternative diagnoses found during duplex Doppler venous examinations of the lower extremities

J. P. Borgstede and G. E. Clagett
Department of Radiology, Penrose Hospital, Colorado Springs, Colorado 80933.

This paper reports the alternative diagnoses identified during duplex Doppler venous examinations (DDVE) of the lower extremities and their significance in patient management to emphasize the importance of careful imaging of the site of maximum symptoms as well as of the venous system, particularly when a DDVE is negative for thrombus. Because numerous other papers have already verified the sensitivity, specificity, and criteria for the diagnosis of thrombophlebitis by ultrasonography, this study evaluates only the alternative diagnoses. In a 1-year period, 886 examinations were performed on 664 patients. Of these, 657 examinations (67%) in 457 patients were negative for deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Fifty-one of these examinations in 51 different patients resulted in an alternative positive diagnosis believed to account for the patient's symptoms. These 51 patients make up 11.25% of the patients negative for DVT (51/457), 5.7% of all examinations (51/886), and 7.7% of all patients studied (51/664). Alternative diagnoses, which occur frequently and are significant, should be considered when performing a DDVE, because ultrasonography is the only commonly used imaging modality by which these alternative diagnoses can be made.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
V. Tapson
The Diagnostic Approach to Acute Venous Thromboembolism . Clinical Practice Guideline
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., September 1, 1999; 160(3): 1043 - 1066.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.