JUM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Terry, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Frick, M. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Terry, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Frick, M. P.

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol 11, Issue 12 647-651, Copyright © 1992 by American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Intrarenal Doppler: characteristics of aging kidneys

J. D. Terry, J. A. Rysavy and M. P. Frick
Section of Radiology, Creighton University Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska 68131.

The normal range of Doppler findings in native kidneys has not been studied extensively. This study correlates changes in Doppler resistive index (RI) with age in patients without renal risk factors or renal disease. Young and old patients demonstrated the highest RI values (age < 1, mean RI = 0.73; age > 59, RI = 0.68), and patients in the 20-39 year age group showed the lowest values (RI = 0.59). The mean RI for all ages was 0.63. The cause of this variability is unknown. We suggest that age-related changes in Doppler values should be considered in the interpretation of renal Doppler measurements.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. Parolini, A. Noce, E. Staffolani, G. F. Giarrizzo, S. Costanzi, and G. Splendiani
Renal Resistive Index and Long-term Outcome in Chronic Nephropathies
Radiology, September 1, 2009; 252(3): 888 - 896.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
C C Geddes and G M Baxter
Renal impairment
Imaging, March 1, 2008; 20(1): 1 - 19.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
A. Garcia-Criado, R. Gilabert, C. Nicolau, M. I. Real, X. Muntana, J. Blasco, S. Ganau, and C. Bru
Value of Doppler Sonography for Predicting Clinical Outcome After Renal Artery Revascularization in Atherosclerotic Renal Artery Stenosis
J. Ultrasound Med., December 1, 2005; 24(12): 1641 - 1647.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
C C Geddes and G M Baxter
Renal impairment
Imaging, January 1, 2005; 17(1): 1 - 18.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. E. Tublin, R. O. Bude, and J. F. Platt
The Resistive Index in Renal Doppler Sonography: Where Do We Stand?
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2003; 180(4): 885 - 892.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
B. Frauchiger, P. Nussbaumer, M. Hugentobler, and D. Staub
Duplex sonographic registration of age and diabetes-related loss of renal vasodilatory response to nitroglycerine
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., June 1, 2000; 15(6): 827 - 832.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.