JUM Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Burks, D. D.
Right arrow Articles by Balsara, Z. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Burks, D. D.
Right arrow Articles by Balsara, Z. N.

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol 10, Issue 9 487-492, Copyright © 1991 by American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Uterine inner myometrial echogenic foci. Relationship to prior dilatation and curettage and endocervical biopsy

D. D. Burks, B. F. Stainken, T. K. Burkhard and Z. N. Balsara
Department of Radiology, Naval Hospital, San Diego, California 92134-5000.

The frequent presence of small echogenic foci within the inner myometrium in women who have had prior uterine instrumentation is reported. Bright foci were observed in 35 of 80 patients who had had prior dilatation and curettage or endocervical biopsy and in only 2 of 174 patients who gave no history of either procedure (P less than 0.005). These foci tend to be small (3 to 6 mm), linear, usually nonshadowing, single or multiple, and located immediately adjacent to the endometrium anywhere along the length of the endometrial cavity; they can be seen many years after the procedure was performed. The histopathologic features of these foci are unconfirmed, but we suspect they represent calcification or fibrosis at sites of mechanical injury to myometrium. The presence of these foci serves as a marker of prior instrumentation and probably has no clinical significance. However, sonographers who are aware of their possible occurrence, can avoid mistaking them for leiomyoma calcifications or for air in the endometrium or myometrium in patients with suspected endometritis.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
C. Duffield, E. O. Gerscovich, M. A. Gillen, J. P. McGahan, and A. Truskinovsky
Endometrial and Endocervical Micro Echogenic Foci: Sonographic Appearance With Clinical and Histologic Correlation
J. Ultrasound Med., May 1, 2005; 24(5): 583 - 590.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Diagnostic Medical SonographyHome page
P. M. Foy, M. L. Blumenfeld, and C. M. Fleming
Secondary Dysmenorrhea Associated with Residual Calcified Chorionic Villi
Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, March 1, 1993; 9(2): 79 - 81.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.