JUM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reece, E. A.
Right arrow Articles by Hobbins, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reece, E. A.
Right arrow Articles by Hobbins, J. C.

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol 10, Issue 8 445-450, Copyright © 1991 by American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine


JOURNAL ARTICLE

A prospective longitudinal study of growth in twin gestations compared with growth in singleton pregnancies. II. The fetal limbs

E. A. Reece, S. Yarkoni, M. Abdalla, S. Gabrielli, T. Holford, T. Z. O'Connor, M. Bargar and J. C. Hobbins
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.

The assessment of fetal growth is crucial in twin gestations, since the information gained often has an impact on pregnancy management. The measurement of the fetal anatomy by ultrasound enables us to follow the growth and development of the fetus. However, the pattern of fetal growth in twin gestations has not yet been precisely characterized in prospective studies. In this light, we initiated a prospective longitudinal study and sonographically examined 35 patients with twin gestations every 3 weeks from the 15th week until delivery. Multiple biometric parameters were measured, including the femur length, humerus length, ulna length, and tibia length. The results of our study showed that growth of these long bones was not significantly different between twins A and B throughout gestation and that the growth velocity between twins and singletons was not significantly different. The incremental growth, although significantly less in twins than in singletons, was so small that it was judged not to be of clinical importance to warrant the generation of separate nomograms for the evaluation of growth in twin gestations.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
M. SENOO, K. OKAMURA, J. MUROTSUKI, N. YAEGASHI, S. UEHARA, and A. YAJIMA
Growth Pattern of Twins of Different Chorionicity Evaluated by Sonographic Biometry
Obstet. Gynecol., May 1, 2000; 95(5): 656 - 661.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.