JUM etoc signup
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Skovron, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Chitkara, U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Skovron, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Chitkara, U.

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol 10, Issue 3 153-159, Copyright © 1991 by American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Evaluation of early third-trimester ultrasound screening for intrauterine growth retardation

M. L. Skovron, G. S. Berkowitz, R. H. Lapinski, J. M. Kim and U. Chitkara
Laboratory of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York 10010-2598.

Ultrasound fetal biometry is widely used for detection of intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR). Since fetal growth is a dynamic process, studies estimating validity of ultrasound near term may not be applicable earlier in pregnancy. This study applied receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to ultrasound biometric data obtained at 26-34 weeks gestation to predict fetuses destined to be IUGR at birth. In this method, the area under the curve (theta) is the index of performance. Sixty-nine (9%) of the 768 singleton infants studied were IUGR at birth. Ultrasound estimated fetal weight (theta = .793) and abdominal circumference (theta = .785) had equivalent performance, significantly better than head circumference (theta = .724) or femur length/abdominal circumference ratio (theta = .619). Performance was not as good as suggested by studies conducted within 2 weeks of delivery.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. Smith-Bindman, P. W. Chu, J. L. Ecker, V. A. Feldstein, R. A. Filly, and P. Bacchetti
US Evaluation of Fetal Growth: Prediction of Neonatal Outcomes
Radiology, April 1, 2002; 223(1): 153 - 161.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.