JUM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heiserman, J.
Right arrow Articles by Goldstein, R. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Heiserman, J.
Right arrow Articles by Goldstein, R. B.

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol 10, Issue 3 121-124, Copyright © 1991 by American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Effect of measurement errors on sonographic evaluation of ventriculomegaly

J. Heiserman, R. A. Filly and R. B. Goldstein
Department of Radiology, University of California School of Medicine, San Francisco 94143.

Ventriculomegaly is a sensitive indicator of maldevelopment of the fetal brain and spinal cord. The fetal ventricular atrium is an optimal portion of the lateral ventricular system to measure in order to judge ventriculomegaly. We tested the susceptibility of this measurement to inaccuracies created by errors in cursor placement or improper selection of the plane of section for measurement in 52 normal fetuses. This measurement was shown to be reasonably insensitive to errors in cursor placement along the axis of the ventricular system. However, choice of an off-axis image plane of section, an angled measurement, or improper choice of ventricular boundary leads to a relatively large number of false-positive test results (approximately 10%). None of the simulated errors in atrial measurements underestimates the size of the ventricle, and thus, they are unlikely to result in a diminution of test sensitivity.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. Levine, H. A. Feldman, J. F. Kazan Tannus, J. A. Estroff, M. Magnino, C. D. Robson, T. Y. Poussaint, C. E. Barnewolt, T. S. Mehta, and R. L. Robertson
Frequency and Cause of Disagreements in Diagnoses for Fetuses Referred for Ventriculomegaly
Radiology, May 1, 2008; 247(2): 516 - 527.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
B. Almog, R. Gamzu, R. Achiron, O. Fainaru, and Y. Zalel
Fetal Lateral Ventricular Width: What Should Be Its Upper Limit? A Prospective Cohort Study and Reanalysis of the Current and Previous Data
J. Ultrasound Med., January 1, 2003; 22(1): 39 - 43.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.