JUM etoc signup
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Karis, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Bowie, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Karis, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Bowie, J. D.

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol 10, Issue 2 83-87, Copyright © 1991 by American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Sonographic diagnosis of premature cervical dilatation. Potential pitfall due to lower uterine segment contractions

J. P. Karis, B. S. Hertzberg and J. D. Bowie
Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710.

Antenatal sonography is an accepted method of evaluating the cervix and lower uterine segment. Dilatation of the endocervical canal can be missed due to compression by an overdistended urinary bladder, intermittent changes in configuration of the cervix, and suboptimal visualization. However, the potential for overdiagnosis of this entity has not been previously emphasized. We present 14 cases demonstrating how contractions in the lower uterine segment can result in an appearance that falsely simulates preterm dilatation of the endocervical canal. The overdiagnosis of this entity can be avoided by distinguishing the following features typical of "pseudodilatation" due to a contraction: (1) apparent cervical length greater than 5 cm; (2) demonstration of normal-appearing cervical tissue distal to the apparently dilated region; and (3) rounding of the myometrium surrounding the apparently dilated area. If any of these features is detected in a patient with sonographic characteristics suggesting dilatation of the cervix, the possibility of pseudodilatation should be considered, and the lower uterine segment should be rescanned later in the examination.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.