JUM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hadlock, F. P.
Right arrow Articles by Park, S. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hadlock, F. P.
Right arrow Articles by Park, S. K.

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol 1, Issue 3 97-104, Copyright © 1982 by American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Fetal biparietal diameter: a critical re-evaluation of the relation to menstrual age by means of real-time ultrasound

F. P. Hadlock, R. L. Deter, R. B. Harrist and S. K. Park
Department of Radiology, Jefferson Davis Hospital, Houston, TX 77019.

The relationship between fetal biparietal diameter (BPD) and menstrual age was determined by cross-sectional analysis of 533 fetuses (12 to 40 weeks) examined with a linear array real-time (dynamic image) scanner using specifically defined methodology. Mathematical modeling of the data demonstrated that the optimal fit was the linear cubic function (r2 = 99 per cent); predicted BPD values calculated from the function were most comparable with composite data from cross-sectional studies performed with static scanners after 1974 (average difference, 0.22 mm) and least comparable with composite data from cross-sectional studies performed with static scanners before 1974 (average difference, 2.0 mm). The variability associated with predicting menstrual age from the BPD increased progressively throughout gestation; the maximal variability was noted between 36 and 42 weeks (+/- 3.6 weeks). Comparison with our longitudinal study of BPD growth indicates that the cross-sectional data represent a valid estimate of the true longitudinal BPD growth curve of the population.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
W. Lee, R. L. Deter, B. McNie, L. F. Goncalves, J. Espinoza, T. Chaiworapongsa, M. Balasubramaniam, and R. Romero
The Fetal Arm: Individualized Growth Assessment in Normal Pregnancies
J. Ultrasound Med., June 1, 2005; 24(6): 817 - 828.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
M. Predanic, A. Cho, F. Ingrid, and J. Pellettieri
Ultrasonographic Estimation of Fetal Weight: Acquiring Accuracy in Residency
J. Ultrasound Med., May 1, 2002; 21(5): 495 - 500.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
G. M. Pradhan, N. G. Chaubal, J. N. Chaubal, and J. Raghavan
Second-Trimester Sonographic Diagnosis of Nonrhizomelic Chondrodysplasia Punctata
J. Ultrasound Med., March 1, 2002; 21(3): 345 - 349.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Diagnostic Medical SonographyHome page
J. Yaghoobian
Simplified Method for Estimation of Gestationa Age by Biparietal Diameter Measurement
Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, January 1, 1987; 3(1): 33 - 35.
[PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1982 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.